Friday, May 15, 2009

Serve it Up Bruce

More in my series.....

After an onslaught of self-induced and selective good news PR the past fortnight the NZX has come out in their usual bovver boy "attack is the best form of defence" manner and fired at Bruce Sheppard.

http://static.stuff.co.nz/1242299840/001/2413001.jpg

You see, unlike NZX, Bruce Sheppard actually does a bit of work (in his own time) crunching numbers that really a Regulator should be aware of if properly overseeing the market. Only NZX as we all can see is too busy with their commercial operation to bother even knowing the definition of "conflict of interest", let alone worry about the Regulatory function. All the Regulatory staff are possibly having too much fun coming in each morning motivated by their increased share prices from the two year 80% loans they were given by the company.

Many companies do not disclose the terms of their loans, known as covenants, but Mr Sheppard warned yesterday that three weeks of research revealed nine companies were probably in breach of bank covenants in 2008 and a further 11 close to being in breach.

The bovver boys of NZX and fund industry are now coming after Sheppard.

The fact he's not willing to disclose the companies he's written to indicates they haven't done a great deal of work anyway,'' said a domestic equities manager for one of the country's leading fund managers.

"To say he's gone through 47 companies in three weeks is a huge ask because it takes a whole team of analysts around the country longer to do that. He does have a valid point, they don't disclose covenants."

Sheppard has a list of listed companies that the NZX is meant to be regulating that have breached banking covenants.

Whale Oil has looked at this issue with respect to Kordia, an SOE. They were openly breaching theirs as outlined in this blunt piece of analysis. But they were honest enough to disclose it.

The Chartered Secretaries have come out this week and added their weight behind the call to split the commercial and regulatory function of NZX.

Professional body Chartered Secretaries believes the NZX's role as both regulator and a participant in the exchange is a conflict of interest.

Chief executive Grant Diggle says the NZX has measures in place which supposedly separate its activities, but it is not enough.

"People in the market need to know for for sure that the regulator is the regulator is the regulator and that a market participant is a market participant and never the twain shall meet."

Mr Diggle says the situation is much like having a referee who is allowed to play the game.

I would go further and say the situation currently is like the NZX are refereeing, playing, managing, controlling the salary cap, the television rights and making the actual rules up.

And we know the only organisation in the world powerful enough to possibly do this is the Indian Premier League (IPL).

So Bruce..........just serve it up. Pass the information to the Regulator and make them serve it up....

When you are ready.

Update: - Seems Bruce isn't quite ready and instead serves it back to NZX

Surely earning a place on the CEO's Deadwood list.

10 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Problem is CK Marky is very very close to JK and to certain big players so hes bullet proof. Sadly my international colleagues are shaking their heads in wonderment that those involved just dont understand that if we want to attract foreign investment then we need to demonstrate we have the very best corporate governance model to offset our other risk factors of size etc. Thanks for the quote I guess you can pick the initals

gd

2:38 PM, May 15, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Of course the other issue CK is that if the Regulatory function was split then we would expect to see a functioning proactive regulator rather than a passive see no evil, hear no evil speak no evil regulator

IMHO the job of a regulator is to set fair and reasonable and minimal rules and then let the players get on with the game. Dont slow the good operators but keep a watchful eye on the dodgy ones and hit them hard if they step out of line

It aint rocket science never was rocket science Its all about having the will capacity and capability to allow the market to flourish and grow and encourage more and new entrants.

I know this is a novel suggestion given the events of the past but one does hope to see a change for the better in the not too distant future.

Depends in whether JK and others have what it takes

gd

2:51 PM, May 15, 2009  
Blogger peterquixote said...

my opinion is that we do need ghood representation at these Company meetings,
and i think Shepperd has done us well so far, mebe we need someone in a suit to sock it hard to business kate and NZX

9:48 PM, May 15, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Excellent work Kate...once again you've launch the MSM into action

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10572609

7:36 AM, May 16, 2009  
Blogger adamsmith1922 said...

CK

Today's Herald has a lengthy article on NZX and Weldon, but is not as strong as your first piece, too many apologists.

I really wonder sometimes is people in NZ really understand the issues related to governance

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10572609

11:18 AM, May 16, 2009  
Blogger expat said...

Adam, the herald story is PR spin attempting to pass as some form of journalism.

To provide a bit of balance, Weldon has transformed the NZX from a dodgy old market into a business that makes money.

5:34 AM, May 17, 2009  
Blogger Cactus Kate said...

And to provide more balance Expat

--- by using the position of regulator of the market.....

Again - there's no reason why this business could do anything but make money based on its current model. That I have no issue with.

Lets take the regulatory function off NZX and see what Weldon can do all on his lonesome without the big stick he now carries.

4:40 PM, May 17, 2009  
Blogger expat said...

Very true, and, it depends whether you want to see a capital markets sector in NZ longer term. Without the creation of some liqdity in current and new asset classes there isnt much thats attractive about NZ. Energy pollution offset derivatives and dairy futures would have provided that pull however the first looks unlikely now and I'd say the second is a case of bad timing. Do you really want to open the door to unfettered competion right now? In principle I agree with you, but the timings a bit off.

9:09 PM, May 17, 2009  
Blogger Cactus Kate said...

Go back in time and ask Telecom whether their split was "good timing"? In such a rapidly changing market for everything in the world there is never a good time to do anything is there!

9:22 PM, May 17, 2009  
Blogger expat said...

It's always a great* time to buy property!

* Disclosure, I currently have a gun held to my head by a licensed real estate professional.

10:11 PM, May 17, 2009  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home