Sunday, May 03, 2009

The New Zealand Rich Kid

http://sof.wellington.net.nz/2007kings.jpg

I commenced my career in 1999. From that period on I have by virtue of what I do work in the taxation then the offshore trust industry, dealt with hundreds of children who are heirs to great fortunes, most as beneficiaries of trusts. Some are impressive, disciplined beasts of business or have forged themselves a unique path from their loaded fathers (and it has always been the fathers or grandfathers). And are a dream to deal with because they are responsible, thoughtful human beings with a good sense of finance and the position they find themselves in. Most however are decidedly average people and with that averageness have a sense of entitlement and vulgarity.

The averageness comes from the genetic pool. I have noticed that almost without exception the dumbest children who do the stupidest things that the trust has to continually shell out money for (QC and rehab fees), have the hottest looking mothers. The children who do best are those who have a lesser looking mother but one with a brain, be it University educated or smart in another way such as broad ranging common sense.

Without giving away any secrets, as trustee of trusts or directors of private offshore companies the most important thing is to say "no". Always. There are courses run by private training institutes specifically training us to say "no" and distance yourself from the beneficiary. I have been on three such courses. They are quite fun, else I wouldn't attend. Children of limited intellect and common sense given hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars can be incredibly amusing to watch. Personally I don't find saying the "no" that difficult and I am very good at it, despite being younger than most of those I am saying "no" to. The client is usually the father or grandfather and they are paying you to say no so they don't have to.

And that's precisely where it all goes wrong for these kids. Their parents have never said "no" and meant it. They are now paying other fiscally sensible people like myself vast sums to say "no".

Easily the most obscene request I had was from a grandchild of a gazillionaire who wanted his own private plane. Not just any plane, but a Gulfstream. More obscene as the "child" was 48, never worked (even in the family corporation) and lived off the trust fund set up by his grandfather, with an average stipend of $US750,000 a year, poor petal, and he spent most of that! His father instructed me to say "no". It wasn't that hard. The abuse that followed was that which only a mother could understand the first time she told her infant that they couldn't have something. To see a 48 year old grown man whose never earned a cent in his life in his own name, chuck a wobbly remains one of the most amusing sights of my career. Less amusing is the constant threat of being sued by one of the brats' friends who happen to be ill-informed lawyers when you do say "no", the physical threats and being yelled at "f***king c**t" down the phone at 3am by these charmers. Oh yes to add them to the "excluded person"schedule one day when they make the terminal mistake of upsetting the client will be an absolute delight.

With the exception of the stockmarket bubble, New Zealand in the 80's wasn't very flagrant in the wealth department. Not with the children that is. Even the early 90's it was quite downmarket, but in the late 90's and early 00's has grown a group of newly-monied families completely inadequately groomed to deal with their spoilt brat offspring.

In the 1980's getting a certain brand of BMX was a sign that your family were "rich", having tennis, piano or golf lessons the same. Plenty of families had beach baches, but they were run down and not fit to be garages in the spectacles that are seen in places like the Coromandel today. We never knew there was much more to offer in the world thanks to Piggy Muldoon gently shielding us from it all due to import restrictions, tariffs and government licensing. We lived in a utopia of anti-materialism. The first sign of spoilt brat syndrome in the 80's and 90's and the child was packed off to Europe to finish their schooling well away from any New Zealand trash influence. There was a procession of generationally wealthy families in New Zealand who packed up and left. Plenty of their children sport US college or Oxbridge degrees. They simply shipped them out of New Zealand as soon as they could.

Unlike the rest of the Western world, New Zealand's spoilt brat generation is just really emerging now. So with it all the problems that other more sophisticated and wealthy countries have already faced. China is suffering the same phenomenon, but the Chinese attitude towards wealth differs from New Zealand in discipline and value. New Zealand spoilt brats are aimless, directionless and no one at home will say "no" to. In the wealth management business we have a term "ni**er rich" (the modern day equivalent of "nouveau riche" or refined definition of the UK "chav") to describe those of any race of person who has suddenly got access to a large amount of money (usually in the form of over-extending debt) and spend it on stupid things. New Zealand has its own breed emerging of the "ni**er rich".

There is probably enough demand now for private training institutes to swoop on Intermediate school age students in wealthy schools and train these youngsters before they are ruined at High School age, about the often life-threatening dangers that they will be faced with as an under-educated and under-sophisticated spoilt brat. A few celebrity tutor parents I can think of now who have faced the wrath of losing control of their own brat.

Parents of these children (almost always those from white lower-middle class and wealth backgrounds now moving to the high incomed middle classes) have over-watered them with money. Money that necessarily other children in their peer group don't have. If something is broken, they get Dad to buy another one. They are in trouble, Dad doesn't send in himself, he calls a QC. Instead of the 80's and 90's where the worst thing the child did was blown it on space invaders or fish and chips, now they are getting into little gangster groups, and with it hard liquor, drugs and knives. They drive pimped vehicles that most New Zealand adults cannot afford. Guns will be the next to follow in this culture, they are already there - I guess these kids will start shooting at each other.

New Zealanders have a terrible attitude towards talking about wealth and it trickles down to their kids unless there is a generational chain of wealth. Compare it with China where even the poorest children are educated to protect wealth from their early primary school years. Chinese parents will talk to their kids about wealth before they ever will mention sex, which could explain why there is a billion of them, but all very financially aware. To have money in New Zealand is deemed offensive, to talk about it and how you have more than other families is even worse. So rather like a 15 year old without any sex education at all, over-monied New Zealand brats are being sent out without any knowledge of the danger that being flagrantly wealthy or having high profile parents in New Zealand who are that way inclined, will bring.....attention.

And that attention means being shunned by nice people who could be good friends and attracts bludgers, gangs and other bottom feeders who are very hard to say "no" to. So what are the danger signs? Nowadays they are not at all subtle.

1. You've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on a private school education for your kid. Yet all their "friends" are colour-wearing rejects from the bad part of town who they seem to know very little about - largest warning sign. These are wanna be g.a.n.g members.

2. At summer time the friends your children invite to the million dollar bach arrive and your neighbours immediately hide their valuables. The whole village can't be wrong.

3. Interest in American sub-culture. And they are a pale, skinny white kid.

4. Sudden interest in chemistry. Strange pipes, tubes or glasses in the room. These are used for d.r.u.g.s.

5. Despite hundreds of thousands of dollars on private school education, your child writes indescribable messages in a language you do not understand and it's not text messaging.

6. Shoe boxes full of cash under the bed representing more than his or her daily ATM limit. These are the proceeds of c.r.i.m.e. The bad kids can't keep this money at home or their parents will steal it.

7. Sudden popularity amongst peers. Money buys this, as does the d.r.u.g.s that money can buy.

8. Disrespect for women, small animals or the police.

9. People with silly name syndrome start inviting themselves over to your house. Some of them are no longer at school. Some seem to be dating your daughter.

10. You google search and find your child on Bebo. You do not understand anything written on the page.

Families used to wealth can spot these signs early. Particularly the friends their children accumulate. Which is why they are careful to ensure their children only mix with their own. The patriarch of the family will ensure this is controlled. It's not snobbery to vet them as much as self-preservation for their breed. One bad apple can influence their child to mix with undesirables and rot the family to the core. Grandparents will cut off money to parents if they do not control their children. Spendthrift clauses will be exercised. Whole generations will risk being sliced out of the wealth carve-up. Intergenerationally wealthy families are almost entirely self-governing.

The real danger with these new age spoilt brats is that their recently emerging wealthy parents do not know how to handle the situation that their family now finds themselves in. If the parent is blowing money left, right and centre then the child will follow suit and consider the family money as their own. They will view their mother's spending habits and consider she doesn't do anything so why should they. Most have a good point there. But all fail to realise that they are not the ones who are actually rich. Their father or grandfather or great-grandfather was. They are in their own right worth nothing truly of their own. This is detrimental to their self-worth when someone outside the bubble which they live tells them they are worthy of none of the respect that the breadwinner in their family is.

I don't think the quality or quantity of time spent with their children is in the slightest bit important to how the child turns out from what I have seen. Some of the worst examples of children turn out from parents who constantly supervise their children and spend holidays and live in each others pockets. Some of the better examples barely saw their father growing up and bonded more with a maid or nanny than either parent. New Zealand is just getting used to the levels of wealth that other countries have enjoyed for years. People always look for the excuse of "time" spent with a child over the source of every problem - money. Too much of it in this case. And the answer "no". Too little of it here.

These offending New Zealand parents have no wealth succession or wealth education plans for their children. They may have a family trust that isn't really a trust as there is no independent trustee paid to say "no". Most currently are teenagers from Auckland in expensive private schools. It will spread to Wellington and the provinces. If not already.

It all starts with turning off the money tap as soon as the child is a teenager (perhaps even earlier) and saying "no" to everything extravagant, stupid and subsidising of their friends and the lifestyle the friends want to have hanging out with the spoilt brat.

http://www.zillow.com/blog/files/2008/01/money-tap.jpg

And until a parent does this then they are just as much to blame for the brats behaviour as the child themselves and deserve the consequences that this genetic stupidity brings mixing bad behaviour with unlimited access to unearned wealth.

36 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

As they say, the first generation earns it, the second generation lives off it, and the third generation loses it.

9:42 PM, May 03, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I wonder if Hine and Paul said no enough.

9:59 PM, May 03, 2009  
Blogger Fi from Four Paws and Whiskers said...

Spot on Kate...
We obviously read the same headlines.... and I wrote a little of this earlier today -
yours is of course far more in depth, far more entertaining and excellent as always - which is why I rad you every day.
http://fourpawsandwhiskers.blogspot.com/2009/05/just-what-are-we-teaching-kids-today.html

10:16 PM, May 03, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ni**er rich!! I am loving the expression and using it already to describe people I know.

1:44 AM, May 04, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What do you think of inheritance tax?

1:53 AM, May 04, 2009  
Blogger Cactus Kate said...

I conceptually LOVE it.

More business for us :)

1:56 AM, May 04, 2009  
Blogger FAIRFACTS MEDIA said...

A most excellent article, Cactus.

9:30 AM, May 04, 2009  
Anonymous Techie Business Owner said...

Cactus your quote saying, ...they are paying you to say no so they don't have to.This is what I don't understand lawyers like you who do job like this in charging huge amount for something not new but is just a repetitive process (not re-inventing, since it is already in the lawbook). Lawyers like you are leechers, which I find abhorring. I mean if I do something repetitive, then the first few incidents would be hard, but as one is doing it repetitively, then it should be less hassle afterwards.

I am part owner of a business (NZ based) in the tech sector and our patent attorney (US - based) is charging us huge fees for doing nothing except that she has to read thru 60 pages or more (approximately 5 minutes) in each of our (claimant) patent documents. That's it, just 5 minutes for a very huge fees each time we lodge a new patent application. We stick with her because she is one of the top dog in this field, but I said to her once, that I made her job easier, because we (me & my team) had already done some reading of the law book regarding patent claims, therefore when the documents arrived at her desk, all she does is to rubber stamp those. Even rubber stamping costs huge amount of money, even though she admitted to us that we don't need her service since we know everything in the law book (although we're not lawyers).

We in the tech industries pay/fund huge amount of money for R&D, but it is justifiable, because R&D is about originality, ie, something completely new and has never been done before (by anyone in the world), while lawyers like yourself including our US attorney is being paid huge amount of money for just rubber stamping something they already know and has been doing for years. There is no new knowledge there to be investigated or to be researched such as R&D, just same old thing everyday. That's why I view all lawyers as leechers of the society.

9:31 AM, May 04, 2009  
Blogger John Q Public said...

I too would love it, as those not sensible enough to engage Cactus or one her mates, would buy life insurance to pay the tax bill when it arrives post muertos.

11:08 AM, May 04, 2009  
Anonymous alex Masterley said...

Well said.
In my own sweet way I am mastering the art of saying no as well.
The hard bit is keeping a straight face when there is an adverse reaction to a negative response.

11:38 AM, May 04, 2009  
Blogger The ex-expat said...

It all starts with turning off the money tap as soon as the child is a teenager (perhaps even earlier) and saying "no" to everything extravagant, stupid and subsidising of their friends and the lifestyle the friends want to have hanging out with the spoilt brat.
Actually it all starts earlier, far, far earlier. My mother said she could spot the kids that were going to turn out who was going to have problems by 6 or 7. Remember those teenagers were the kids who had lavish parties thrown for them when they were younger and the latest gidgets and gadgets to help buy popularity.

Warren Buffet had the greatest idea on dealing with offspring, he paid for university and after than were on their on.

12:24 PM, May 04, 2009  
Blogger Kevin said...

Anyone ever seen a 'skip-a-generation' will? An interesting option. A very succinct piece and thank you for it.

1:34 PM, May 04, 2009  
Blogger Cactus Kate said...

TBO

You are joking? This is the ultimate pot, kettle, black.

You are a techie. From what I see, as an untrained eye, your business is repetitive, the same problems come up and even worse you can fuck up someone's network or systems then charge them to fix it! Remember the Y2k virus? Yep.....a goldmine for the tech industry.

How about charging customers for technology that is already out of date as the new model is already being built as the old is selling? The constant upgrades required, the newer, better, shinier model..

Wait until someone decides to steal your patent and copy your work, then you will see how good your lawyer is. That "5 minutes for 60 pages"? Yep and if one word is out of place in that 60 pages you are rooted.

And if you think lawyers rates are extortionate, try techies!!

1:42 PM, May 04, 2009  
Anonymous observer said...

Ah yes, the Skip-a-generation will, I have one and a wonderful thing it is - especially when the next generation don't know about it. Grandchildren are MUCH nicer than children, and they enable you to extract revenge with ease and enjoyment; who doesn't like saying yes when their grand-child asks for coke, or lollies, or that really noisy toy!

I recommend a skip-a-generation will to anyone with more than $100,000 in their estate. If you have less than that work it carefully so that your last cheque (made out in advance to the undertaker) bounces!

3:55 PM, May 04, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Another well written article CK having raised 2 children to adulthood it aint roket science Its common sense. You start when they are small enough to understand Yes and No and the consequences.

IMHO and observation the parents that get it worng have too much money and not enough common sense or are selfish and regard the kids as an accessory.

Especially applies to career wimmin in their 30s who have children.

gd

4:22 PM, May 04, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Cactus,
I learn more from your Blog about being a responsible trustee (of quite a few inter vivos trusts) than I will ever learn from attending NZ Institute of Chtd Accts educational courses.
I hope you have a wonderful day, as you just made my day more lovely. I am a crusty middle aged provincial town beancounter.

8:23 PM, May 04, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It seems that most of these rich kids don't even like their parents and vice versa. I love my kids without reservation and enjoy their company. I wonder if losing that would be worth being really rich for but suspect not.

My son has a techie mate in HK who is self made at 24 and loaded. We'll visit him next week, go for a ride in the Ferrari and have a beer but I suspect my son wouldn't swap. A freebie to HK travelling cattle class with his Dad and staying in a one room hotel (single beds of course) will be just fine.

9:49 PM, May 04, 2009  
Anonymous Farnarkler said...

TBO you are kidding aren't you? Little tip for you: You don't have to use a patent attorney. You'll be OK you've read a book on it.

If you think a good lawyer is expensive try using a cheap one, or in your case DIY. You'll never pass the simplest due diligence required for M&A or IPO without robust IP. Yes that's right, that big payday you dream of won't happen without it.

By the way, lawyers are leeches, not leechers. That's one of the reasons it costs you so much to have them edit out all the pidgin engineers' english in the patent specs.

Before ask, no I'm not a lawyer. I'm a tech business owner who understands good governance.

10:09 PM, May 04, 2009  
Blogger Cactus Kate said...

"crusty middle aged provincial town beancounter"

You really should stop attending those courses. Waste of time.

9.49pm - plenty of children of poorer parents hate their parents. I don't think it's a phenomenon of the wealthy.

GD - plenty of parents regard their children as an accessory regardless of wealth. At the other end of the spectrum, children are used as benefit bait, band-aid babies (to keep the man in the marriage) and other devious reasons for having children.

10:52 PM, May 04, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Clogs to clogs in three generations.

The biggest problem actually arrives with the arrival of wives of the sons!

Less so the other way around.

Mysoginist, but totally accurate.

12:25 AM, May 05, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Splendid stuff. Should be syndicated.

4:34 AM, May 05, 2009  
Anonymous Techie Business Owner said...

Farnarkler, there is a US VC (Venture Capital) firm which invests in our company. We have a small office (3 people) in the heart of the Silicon Valley. This same VC who had invested (early stage) in Google, Sun Microsystems, and other successful tech business in the US. One of their guys sits on our board of directors. It was them (VC) who insisted on using a patent attorney every time we file for a patent application. They (VC) had done the same things in all their startups they had involved with in the past.

Look, I could self trained myself to be a lawyer without going to law school (except I won't be admitted to the bar). It is not hard to read the law book and any engineer out there who thinks law is hard, then that engineer is not a real engineer.

Cactus Kate talked & praised herself here, like she is God. She always talks in a condescending manner to others (ie, to low earners, non-lawyers, etc...).

12:43 PM, May 05, 2009  
Blogger Cactus Kate said...

TBO

Condescending? I think you need to look no further than yourself.

Sack your lawyer. Sack all of them. Do it yourself. Go on I dare you!

But rather like me and a computer without a tech geek to help me - it will be an unadulterated disaster.

You will no doubt in the US be sued and lose all your money. That's why your US partner is insisting on legal representation, for if anything goes wrong you can sue the lawyer.

Stick to your knitting. I pretend to know no more about what you in tech and engineering (this post wasn't about anything to do with tech or engineering indeed I have NEVER posted about that area) than you should about being a lawyer because it's pretty obvious you don't have a friggin' clue about the pertinent reason that you need one.

You are doing business in America!!!

1:12 PM, May 05, 2009  
Blogger Chris Trotter said...

CK, we're galaxies apart politically speaking, but for my money (risibly paltry I concede) that was one of the best postings I've read on the Web.

Congratulations!

2:58 PM, May 05, 2009  
Anonymous Pharmachick said...

TBO ...
seriously ?

If you cannot stomach the costs then just bloody well off-license to the nearest Genentech clone (or preferably the original) in South SFO, make a few mil and stop complaining.

Otherwise you're complaining about due process to ensure your hundred mil (or bil) profits later.

So far, if you are a Techie from SFO and if your business is truly as you've protrayed, you might be under prepared for the hard-nosed US market, and/or slightly over capitalised and/or under VC-ed (but isn't everyone with VC under VC-ed?! [rhetorical]). And I just hope your "VC" isn't SBIR becasue thats not real VC.

Oh yes, and being in R&D (somewhat) sometimes even the R&D isn't worth it for the return.

Cheers, and best of luck with the tech business, but really; off licensing is not a bad route ;-)

7:03 PM, May 05, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A superb article, good sensible parenting advice for anyone. Its a pretty easy word to say "NO" and with pratice even the most persistent and nagging child (of any age) when faced repeatedly with a firm "NO" will get the message.
You have outdone yourself dear Cactus and while I dont always agree with your view in this instance I unreservedly do.

7:50 PM, May 05, 2009  
Blogger Cactus Kate said...

Thank you Chris.

One day you will see the light and send in your application form to the VRWC.

10:49 PM, May 05, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Having gone to a private school and also have our teenage son in one, I have had plenty of onlooker moments to observe spoilt brats. Most are from Private or Decile 9-10 state schools.

Generally the parents are divorced or on the verge of calling it quits. Money is used to placate, manipulate and bribe by both parent/s and child/ren.

Magnifying all this revolting selfishness is the Leftie mantra from the schooling of the late 80s till now, of "My rights". Again no mention of responsibilities or earning entitlement or serving your time to establish worthiness of rights.

These kids, like their terrible twin,the dysfunctional working class thug, have no empathy or insight on how their actions and decisions affect others. Instant gratification means no patience or endurance and intolerance.

Some of these parents secretly get off on their kids cool and calculating anti-social personalities. The geeks and nerds of the late 70s and 80s, now have made a stinking load of money and now their kid gets to avenge daddy's hard time in secondary school by being rich and in the cool gang. Likewise because daddy plays the hard bastard at work and brings it home, isn't it any wonder that the son is a chip off the old block? Even the threat of police involvement in their kid's petty crime is met with "just don't get caught". When you try and reason with these twisted parents all you get is an earful of abuse, and so the cycle continues.

I am pleased to say they are a very small minority, but their hideous ways are the headline grabbers.

Cheers, sally

11:11 PM, May 05, 2009  
Blogger Cactus Kate said...

Pharmachick

I consider doing business in the US without adequate legal representation akin to having sex in an African whorehouse without condoms. That risky.

12:10 AM, May 06, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"It's not snobbery to vet them as much as self-preservation for their breed. "

Except for this comment, I really enjoyed your post.

Because I think you're dead wrong about it being snobbery. Snobbery has always been an attempt to preserve the breed.

Back in the day the british did it via their public school system (which is extant) and their university system (which didn't let the "wrong sort" into the good oxbridge colleges, a system which is slowly breaking down). The americans invented their sorority/fraternity system to do the same. All aimed to try and stop the young from hanging out with (and breeding with) the wrong sort.

icehawk

10:29 AM, May 06, 2009  
Blogger Cactus Kate said...

Snobbery though can be related to class, intellect, who your ancestors are and not just wealth.

This article is only mentioning of wealth. I know plenty of snobby families in NZ who aren't even that rich or well educated.

I argue here that they are keeping their children away from others to protect their wealth...not for reasons of class, intellect or who your ancestors are because in NZ there is no class system based on royalty etc as we have none.

12:19 PM, May 06, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Cactus,

I nearly fell off my chair to see a compliment to you from Chris Trotter!

Next thing we know he'll be agreeing with your political commentary. Maybe the shades are up and the sunglasses are coming off and he's finally seeing things clearly.

Mental Belle

2:47 PM, May 06, 2009  
Blogger Cactus Kate said...

I don't see how that was a compliment to Trotter.

I was being polite informing him we will accept him as acceptable when he changes to thhe right-wing where every mature, sensible person belongs.

3:53 AM, May 07, 2009  
Anonymous Mark said...

Sorry if I offend people who blog here, but it is not children who are brought up in wealth I worry about it's the children who are brought up with the Bank of MOM and DAD that are the problem.

They think they will be bailout of whatever situation they find themsevles in.

7:38 PM, May 08, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Raw intelligence is passed from the Mother. The DNA sequence for this was found a year or two ago.

Perhaps it does follow that successful A type males who win trophy wives end up with children who have their mothers brains.

10:44 PM, May 09, 2009  
Blogger peterquixote said...

Trusts are set up to benefit beneficiaries Kate,
not to benefit sharp Trust lawyers,
this is why most sensible people keep the trustees in the family, the costs are minimal and the decisions equitable.

8:49 PM, May 14, 2009  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home